Showing posts with label clean energy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label clean energy. Show all posts

Monday, September 29, 2014

The $30 billion jobs opportunity

In an election year, you cannot swing a dead cat without hitting a political ad, photo op, or campaigning politician. In a country still reeling in many ways from the economic collapse of six years ago, the largest talking point still centers around job growth. Regardless of one's opinion on how many jobs we really need as we develop more and more efficient ways to maintain our quality of life, the current state of affairs in Illinois comes down to 433,000 people who want and need to work who cannot find a job. With approximately 150,000 to 200,000 job openings in Illinois going unfulfilled, we would need to create about 250,000 new jobs in order to obtain full employment. With manufacturing making a slow recovery, and nowhere near fast enough to create that kind of growth, where can we turn for good paying, productive jobs?

Clean energy and energy efficiency.

Currently, Illinois' residential and small business consumers spend over $30 billion a year for energy. Almost all of that capital leaves the state, with only a small portion getting recycled back into the Illinois economy. If we can find a way to tap into that capital already being spent, and turn that into job growth, we can both improve our employment situation and create a cleaner, healthier future. In addition, that $30 billion, at current rates of escalation, can be $35-40 billion within only a year or two, so economically, it behooves us to move quickly.

The key to the job growth comes from the need for almost all energy efficiency and clean energy work to use local labor. The fixing up of homes and small commercial buildings, installation of solar panels, and construction of wind turbines uses, almost exclusively, local labor. Dirty energy industries, including nuclear, employ somewhere between 5 and 8 people for every $1 million spent. Clean energy and energy efficiency employ about 16 to 17 in good, median income-scale jobs. That means that our $30 billion each year could fund as many as 495,000 jobs in Illinois. Even if we only took half of our current energy expenditures and switched them to clean energy or energy efficiency, we would more than eliminate our current unemployment. In addition, we would build a stronger, more resilient economy less susceptible to shocks from energy price increases.

It will take much work in our financial sector to develop the mechanisms to make this change happen, but it can happen within months, not years. We have the capacity to train workers through our robust community college network. We have the knowhow through years of programs managed by local consultants and non-profits. All it takes is for the financial system to let small building owners tap into the same tools to which institutions and large customers already have access. Tools like on-bill financing, property-assessed clean energy, and community energy cooperatives provide the mechanism that can turn $30 billion a year in energy expenditures into a $500 billion construction program.

It will also take political will...to bring big energy companies and utilities to the table when any program like this is in the interest of the consumer but not large energy companies. It will be interesting to see if either candidate for Governor has the insight or will to make something like this happen.



Friday, June 6, 2014

Friday Five: June 6, 2014

On the quality of life front, there was only one main story this week, and everyone has a different take on it.Some think that it merely codifies the direction the economy is already heading.
Hopes for impact of carbon rules in US are modest
"'I don’t think it’s a revolution because our carbon emissions are already going down because of cheap natural gas,' said Michael Lynch, president of Strategic Energy and Economic Research, a consultancy. 'It’s not Obama’s war on coal. It’s reality’s war on coal. Natural gas turns out to be better than coal in the marketplace.'"

Some – especially those in the fossil fuel industry – think it will increase the cost of electricity and could eliminate more jobs than it saves.
5 things to know about emissions caps
"As more wind turbines and solar panels are installed, jobs in fabrication, construction and sales will shift there. Ditto for new natural-gas-fired power plants, which could lead to more drilling jobs in gas-rich states from Texas to Colorado to Pennsylvania."

Others, even those who have railed against environmental protections in the past, understand that when taken in total, the benefits far outweigh the costs.
Obama acts to curb carbon
"The apocalyptic predictions have been made before, without coming true. In 1990, when Congress approved new measures to reduce acid rain, critics said they would cause electricity rates to climb without doing any environmental good. (I was one of them.) Some anticipated a 'clean air recession'.
In fact, electricity rates have declined in inflation-adjusted terms since the restrictions were adopted, and the favorable results — including lives saved — have been far greater than expected. The economy boomed in the 1990s. A 2003 report by the Bush administration's Office of Management and Budget found that the benefits of these and related air pollution rules were at least 11 times more than the costs."

And some see how the effects of carbon pollution go beyond economics, human health, or even the availability of energy…down to the issues of basic human and civil rights.
Climate change is a civil rights issue
"These vulnerable children end up missing more school because the air they breathe makes them sick. Their parents miss work they can’t afford to lose.
Utility companies have kept these plants running decades longer than they were designed to last because air pollution laws had loopholes that made it cheaper to keep old plants going than to replace them with newer, cleaner power plants. Profits were more important than people."

Meanwhile, others want you to know how far you could reduce the impact your lifestyle has on the quality of life of others.
Tiny-home-in-a-box will turn 200 sq. ft. into a sophisticated dining room AND trashy nightclub
"The CityHome was designed to be an all-in-one furniture module for tiny spaces: It can transform a room from a bedroom to an office to a kitchen, for example, with a literal wave of the hand. This is the future!"

Happy Friday!
JIM URQUHART / REUTERS

Friday, March 7, 2014

Friday Five(s): March 7, 2014...Cabin Fever Edition

Through a combination of cabin-fever-inspired restlessness, and a measurable uptick in environmental news this week, I cannot bring my brain to choose only five, so I am going with a double-dose...including shorter intros by me.


This should scare the livin' bejeezus out of everyone. (And note, 'bejeezus' is recognized as a word by my autocorrect.)
Chevron launches "news" site
"Ritchie said the site also offers a new model for the future of journalism — one that is funded directly by corporations. 'We believe the website has the potential to blaze the trail for a new model of corporate-sponsored, community-generated news,' the website reads."

The market has changed, and large energy companies - and especially investor-owned utilities - face extinction if they do not find new models.
Schadenfreude about RWE unwarranted
"What should RWE do? ... Maybe we need to be open to the idea that large power corporations were needed for central-station power plants, but that their role in a renewable future will be much smaller. At the moment, even the proposal to have them leverage their size to set up an enabling infrastructure – such as charging stations for electric cars – seems unlikely. The firms don't even have the liquidity anymore."

I forgive the inappropriate use of 'global warming' in the headline because the article discusses an industry I love. I am inspired to act.
Slope & change: The ski industry struggles to get its act together on global warming
"So what, you might ask, does the ski industry lobby for in Washington, if not for climate action? In the past, it has pushed for looser immigration rules (who’ll wash all those restaurant dishes and change the hotel sheets?) and to make sure that we can continue to import cheap shred threads from China (because, you know, we’ve gotta look good out there)."

In principle, I do not have an issue with natural gas as a bridging fuel if it is employed in retrofit of existing plants, and if carbon capture is required...but until the methane leakage issue is 100% solved, natural gas is as bad as coal...period.
How to make natural gas more climate-friendly
"It doesn’t have to be this way. The technology already exists to dramatically reduce methane leakage for a reasonable price. Environmental groups have put out reports outlining how. They could serve as a template for the oil and gas industry to follow voluntarily, or for the EPA to require under the Clean Air Act."

Good consequence, incentives for industry to capture, sequester, and even mine CO2...unintended consequence without regulation, continue depleting fossil fuels as source of "high quality CO2".
Don't waste CO2, turn it into bottles and glue
"If humanity is to avoid dangerous climate change, we need to capture hundreds of billions of tonnes of carbon dioxide. But what to do with it all? There is no shortage of places to bury it, but we can at least put some of it to good use. A few start-up companies view CO2 as a resource rather than a waste product. They are using CO2 as the raw material for making products including superglue and fertilizer."

It's said that collapsing societies burned their last tree to boil their last pot of water to eat their last meal...if we are to avoid that fate, we need to examine our priorities. Maybe cultural icons will help awaken minds.
Syndey Opera House and Statue of Liberty 'will be lost to sea level rise'
"Marzeion said that in Europe, particularly vulnerable sites included the leaning tower of Pisa, which is not directly on the coast but would be affected by sea level rises as a result of even a low temperature increase because it is very low-lying. He also cited Venice, which 'in a sense you can say is being impacted right now' and Hanseatic League cities including Hamburg, Lübeck and Bremen in Germany."

If the loss of Lady Liberty doesn't move us, how about the loss of large sections of a state?
Louisiana's coastline is disappearing too quickly for mappers to keep up
"Each year, this part of the coastline loses around 16 square miles of land, according to David Muth, the state director of the National Wildlife Federation’s Mississippi River Delta Restoration Project. And until quite recently, even the most advanced maps of the area did little to reflect the changing environmental reality. But in the last few years, renewed mapping efforts from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration have begun to catalog these changes. These new maps show water where there was once marshy land, and bays where there were once small inlets."

Speaking of water, unless you live in CA or SD, you may not know how tentative our life is under "feast and famine" deluge-drought cycles.
Americans have no idea how much water we use - or how to conserve it
"Perhaps most troubling, Americans overwhelmingly believe that changing their habits, as opposed to improving the efficiency of their plumbing, is the most effective way to cut down on water consumption. Seventy-six percent of those surveyed said curtailment methods, such as flushing less frequently, are the best way to reduce water use. Only 10 percent chose more preventative measures, such as installing new toilets that use just 1.6 gallons per flush in lieu of old toilets that use five to six gallons."

Of course there is hope if we listen to free market economists and make rational decisions that are in our best economic self-interest. (Hint: That means divesting from fossil fuels and investing in clean energy & energy efficiency solutions.)
Energy efficiency creates 387% return on investment for US Southeast
"A wide range of economic benefits contributed to the overall $78.3 million in regional economic output created by SEEA’s energy efficiency upgrades. $55.7 million in economic output and 240 jobs were created through direct effects from program spending, while $22.2 million in economic output and 106 jobs were created via direct effects like efficiency goods and services. Induced effects from households or workers spending newfound money on consumer goods or services created an additional $366,471 in economic impacts."

And maybe there is something with tapping into the "keeping up with the Jones'" zeitgeist. Whatever it takes to give my grandkids a high quality of life.
With energy reports, it's game on
"But research has shown that neighbor comparisons are the most effective way to get people to conserve energy, he said. More people respond to hearing what their neighbors are doing than to the prospect of helping the environment or saving money. The comparisons work, he said; the first group of ComEd customers to get the reports, in 2009, reduced their electricity use by 2 percent."

Happy Friday!

Friday, February 28, 2014

Friday Five: February 28, 2014

The risks associated with not only the burning, but the transportation and use of fossil fuels, affects many parts of our quality of life.  Certainly not the least among these is our economy.
Oil spill has shut down Port of New Orleans
"Officials say only a sheen of oil has been reported, but that they don't know how much oil was actually spilled, and are planning a conference call today to figure out how long it will take for the river to reopen. Cost Guard Petty Officer Bill Colclough told the Associated Press that the barge was being pushed by the Hannah C. Settoon tugboat when it hit the grain-barge-pushing Lindsay Ann Erickson tug. The Settoon is a 84.5-foot-long boat built in 2010 and owned by Louisiana-based Settoon Towing."

I remember distinctly listening to the radio when commentators talked about then Vice President Cheney convening an "energy task force" at which Mr. Cheney sidelined Christine Todd Whitman in favor of energy industry leaders.  To me, that stands as the Fort Sumter of the battle between environmental protection and industry.  Much like our Civil War, no one will win.  When it ends, we will do what we can to pick up the pieces.  I only hope that we end this ludicrous battle over whether we as a people have the right to enforce our desire for clean air and water.
Yes, the EPA has the power to stop climate change
"The Supreme Court said as much seven years ago in Massachusetts v. EPA, with Justice Anthony Kennedy casting the deciding vote. As the court explained in that landmark decision, Congress chose to define the air pollutants covered by the Clean Air Act in 'sweeping,' 'capacious' terms—terms that easily cover greenhouse gases. This precedent is the foundation for all of the work the Obama administration is now doing to address climate change, including the regulations and related permitting scheme at issue in UARG."

Speaking of water, evidently John Roberts' influence on the judiciary runs deeper than we think.  A Florida judge just decided that the "individual mandate" applies not only to health insurance purchases, but connecting to municipal water.  Two elements of the story have greater interest to me in the story (and I recommend following the link to the Off the Grid story).  First, the judge seems to have some reluctance in enforcing a code that seems to not fully address the situation.  Second, the website doing the initial reporting supports both environmentalists looking to use natural resources and second amendment proponents looking to protect themselves.  It is an interesting combination of audiences.
Florida judge rules it's illegal to unhook from city's water system
"It’s not really clear why it’s illegal to live off rainwater — it just is. The law doesn’t understand, essentially, how it would even be possible to live without city-provided water. The fact that water regularly comes out of the sky is apparently not compelling."

Maybe we should worry a little less about whether people hook up to municipal water service, and worry a bit more about taking care of people who have worked most of their life and would like a couple of years to enjoy their time on this planet.  Or maybe we should try to fix the paradox that comes with spending the most on healthcare but ranking 33rd in life expectancy.  Don't even get me started on income inequality.
US scores poorly in retirement rankings
"Still, 'the rapid ascent of several other nations' caused the U.S. to remain stuck at 19, Natixis says. Moreover, despite being a wealthy country, the U.S. ranks relatively low when it comes to life expectancy (#33) and income inequality (#81). Other factors dragging down the U.S.’s ranking include high government debt, limited access to medical care, and high per-capita spending on health care. (When it comes to health-care spending, we are #1!)"

This is part #135 in my #575 part series on how money spent on renewable energy and energy efficiency creates more jobs, and a more resilient economy, than money spent on fossil fuels.
Renewable energy firms looking to hire more staff
"The survey indicated Glasgow, the Lothians, Highlands and Islands and the north east topped the list of regions employing the most people, while onshore wind (39%), offshore wind (21%), marine and bioenergy (both 9%) were the most notable sources of employment.
Of the 540 companies surveyed, 54% said they would be looking to employ more people in the next 12 months.
A further 42% said their employment levels would stay the same and only 1.6% expected them to fall."

Happy Friday!

Montreal Gazette

Thursday, February 27, 2014

A year in green tech: energy from green gunk

I love to travel.  Our development of ways to quickly and physically interconnect people of different cultures stands as one of the great achievements of the human species.  Except traveling long distances, and especially across continents, requires fuel.  Fuel comes largely from large fossil deposits within the earth, that when burned produce carbon dioxide and other pollutants that cause harm to our quality of life.  My love of travel has environmental consequences that counteract the positive effect that inter-cultural connectivity can bring.  As we quickly move to electrify our vehicle fleet for local and interstate travel, we will still power long-distance travel (trains, planes, and large ships) with chemical fuels for the foreseeable future.  If we could find a way to produce this fuel using the pollutants we put into the biosphere in such a way as to continually reduce the net pollution, while still providing the energy, that would reverse the deleterious effects, and remove travel from the list of undesirable activities.

As a first attempt, we started to grow biofuels from plants.  You will not read about traditional biofuel production in this series, because it does not meet a relatively simple requirement for green technology: it takes more energy to produce the fuel than the fuel contains after the process.  This highly inefficient process comes with an additional concern.  When using food stock (such as corn, soy, or sugar cane) as the input to the biofuel process, we introduce demand into the marketplace and affect the price of commodities that supply our nutrition.  Using arable land to grow fuel takes away land from food production, increasing the prices of basic commodities, and potentially every grown food product.  Although we have seen some potential in using the waste products from food production (such as the leftover stalks from corn and cane), we still do not see the efficiencies that a green fuel should have.

The most promising opportunity comes from the cultivation of algae - and more specifically, micro algae.  Although research into algae produces some confusion over their assignment to a specific kingdom, algae essentially are water-based plants that use photosynthesis to produce energy from carbon dioxide and other nutrients.  In the food chain, algae provide nutrients for water-based animal micro-organisms that then provide nutrients to small fish and sea life, and so on.  The useful characteristic that algae have comes from their storage of energy as a lipid, or fat.  If we can extract these lipids, we can convert them to forms of oils that then power the engines of trains, planes, and ships.

Image by John MacNeill, commissioned by Solix Biofuels
Cultivating algae, extracting the oils, and converting them to useful forms takes a significant amount of work, and until recently, required chemical solvents to make the process even moderately efficient.  Furthermore, extraction required significant energy inputs to dry out the algae to ready it for production.  The resource and energy intensity significantly increased the cost, and made increasing the scale of production difficult.  Recent research has found ways to eliminate the drying and chemical processing steps, instead using a continuous process that relies on heat and pressure to accomplish the task.  Although this does not significantly lower the energy input, it does allow for the commercialization of the process.  The energy input to an industrial facility that produces biofuel from algae can then use solar or some other form of renewable energy to accomplish the task, and at large scales, with much higher efficiencies than traditional biofuels.

The great promise of biofuel production from algae comes from the tangential benefits associated with the process.  The water in which we grow the algae can come from freshwater or saltwater, but even more beneficially, from wastewater.  Our wastewater from municipal sources contains many basic nutrients that we need to survive, but which pollute our freshwater sources.  These nutrients, primarily nitrogen and phosphorus, feed the algae, and as we harvest the carbon-based oils, we can also extract the nitrogen and phosphorus.  An algae production facility as part of a sewage treatment plant or run-of-river operation could significantly reduce or even eliminate eutrophication, the destruction of saltwater ecosystems by freshwater pollution.  In addition, as with all photosynthetic processes, the production of energy in algae requires carbon dioxide as an input.  Placing the industrial facilities near and around urban environments would remove carbon dioxide at rates significantly faster than current urban systems.  Monetizing the carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorous extraction, along with increased economy of scale, will bring the price of algae biofuels in line with expected prices for fossil fuels.

Even with this environmentally beneficial method for producing biofuels that can power our planes, trains, and ships, we still need to work on ways to extract the energy without the burning that releases carbon dioxide into the environment.  We also must continue to make the conversion process more efficient so we get more miles out of each unit of energy input.  If we can crack those nuts, and produce biofuels on a large commercial scale, we will have found a component of the green energy future that will allow us to maintain physical contact across borders without damaging our environment in the process.

Resources:
US Department of Energy Bioenergy Technologies Office
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Arizona State University Biofuels Initiative